Skip to content
New: a sample workflow audit report
Scenox Studios

AI readiness assessment

This AI readiness assessment scores one workflow on six things that decide whether automation will work: process, data, systems, volume, risk and people. Answer 12 multiple-choice questions (about three minutes) and you get a score out of 100, a readiness band, your top three fixes and the blueprint that fits. No email needed.

Score how ready your workflow is for AI

Which workflow are you assessing?

Not scored. It picks the blueprint we suggest at the end.

Process

0 / 2 answered
01How consistently is the workflow done today?
02How are exceptions handled?

Data

0 / 2 answered
03What form do the inputs arrive in?
04Do you keep a history of past cases and their outcomes?

Systems

0 / 2 answered
05Can the systems involved be connected?
06How quickly could IT give a project test access?

Volume

0 / 2 answered
07How many items go through the workflow each month?
08How much team time does it take each week?

Risk

0 / 2 answered
09Is it clear which actions need a person to sign off?
10How would you catch a mistake in this workflow today?

People

0 / 2 answered
11Is there a named owner who can make decisions about the workflow?
12How does the team that runs it feel about automating it?

What the assessment measures

Six areas, two questions each. They map to what a workflow audit measures, because each one can stop a project on its own.

AreaWhat we ask aboutWhy it matters
ProcessHow consistently the steps are followed, and how exceptions are handledRules come from a consistent process. Five versions of one workflow need five rule sets.
DataThe form inputs arrive in, and whether past cases have recorded outcomesA pilot is tested on past cases. Without outcomes there is nothing to measure it against.
SystemsAPIs and exports for each tool, and how fast IT can give test accessAccess requests can take longer than the build itself, so they belong in the plan from day one.
VolumeItems per month and team hours per weekVolume decides whether the saving covers the running cost of the system.
RiskWritten approval rules, and how mistakes are caught todayA system can enforce approvals and controls, but people have to define them first.
PeopleA named owner with authority, and how the team feels about the changeOwners sign off pilots. The people running the workflow make the best testers.

Scroll sideways to see every column.

How the score works

Each answer scores 0 to 3. Twelve questions make 36 points, shown as a score out of 100. The three lowest areas become your recommendations, lowest first.

  1. 80–100

    Ready to build

    This workflow is a strong candidate. An audit would mainly confirm volumes, measure the straight-through rate on past cases and set pilot thresholds.

  2. 60–79

    Ready for a pilot

    A scoped pilot on this workflow makes sense. Close the gaps below while the design work happens, so they do not hold up the build.

  3. 40–59

    Groundwork first

    A narrow pilot is possible once the gaps below are closed. Expect some weeks of groundwork on process, data or access before a build starts.

  4. 0–39

    Not ready yet

    Fix the process, the data or the ownership before building anything. Automating this workflow now would mostly encode today's problems.

The AI readiness checklist

The strongest answer to each question, as a list you can check a workflow against without the form. A workflow that meets most of these is a good first candidate.

  • The steps are written down, and everyone follows them
  • Exception types are listed, counted and each has an owner
  • Inputs arrive digitally, ideally as structured data
  • Months of past cases are on record, with their outcomes
  • Every system involved has an API, an export or an integration connector
  • IT can provide a sandbox or read-only access within weeks
  • The workflow handles hundreds of items or more each month
  • It takes at least one person's full week
  • Approval limits are written down and enforced in a system
  • A named control (reconciliation, QA or an audit trail) catches mistakes before customers do
  • One owner has the time and the authority to change the process
  • The team that runs it wants it automated and will help test

From self-assessment to an AI automation audit

The assessment tells you whether a workflow is worth a closer look. An AI automation audit replaces your judgment with measurements. The sample audit shows the full report on a fictional AP team.

CompareThis self-assessmentWorkflow audit
TimeAbout three minutesOne to two weeks for one workflow
Based onYour own judgmentInterviews, a timed sample, your system data and a prototype run on past cases
You getA score, a band, three fixes and a suggested blueprintWorkflow map, measured baseline, automation split, risks and controls, pilot thresholds, build plan and fixed price
CostFree, no emailA fixed fee, agreed before work starts

Scroll sideways to see every column.

More free tools

Questions about AI readiness

What is an AI readiness assessment?

A structured check of whether a workflow, and the team and systems around it, are ready for automation. This one scores a single workflow on process, data, systems, volume, risk and people, then points to the gaps worth closing before anyone builds anything.

How is this different from an AI automation audit?

The self-assessment takes a few minutes and runs on your own judgment. An audit takes one to two weeks: we map the workflow, time a real sample, test a prototype on your past cases and hand you a measured baseline, an automation split and a fixed build price. The sample audit page shows the full report format.

How is the score calculated?

Each of the 12 questions scores 0 to 3 points. Each of the six areas has two questions, so each area is out of 6, and the total is out of 36, shown as a score out of 100. Below 40 is Not ready yet, 40 to 59 is Groundwork first, 60 to 79 is Ready for a pilot and 80 or more is Ready to build.

Should we assess the whole company or one workflow?

One workflow. Readiness varies a lot inside one company: supplier invoices can be ready while sales outreach is not. Score the workflow you would automate first, then repeat the assessment for the next candidate and compare.

What if our workflow scores low?

Then you have learned something cheaply. A low score usually means the process, the data or the ownership needs work first, and fixing those is cheaper than automating around them. The recommendations show where to start.

Do you store my answers?

No. The assessment runs in your browser and the page does not send your answers anywhere. If you want to discuss the result, you choose what to tell us on the contact form.

Measure the workflow that scored well.

A 30-minute call with an engineer. You will leave knowing what a system could do for that workflow and what it would take to build.

What happens next

  1. 1

    Strategy call

    We learn how the workflow runs today and what a good outcome would be.

  2. 2

    Workflow audit

    We map the process and measure where a system would save the most time.

  3. 3

    Proposal

    A written scope, timeline and fixed price for your first system. No obligation to build.