Skip to content
New: a sample workflow audit report
Scenox Studios

Draft engagement letters from approved templates

From a new matter's intake details, the system selects the right template, fills in scope, fees, parties and terms, and highlights any non-standard clause. A partner reviews and sends. For firms where each engagement letter starts as an edited copy of the last one.

Draft engagement letters from approved templates

6 steps

  1. 01

    Select the template

    Rules
  2. 02

    Fill the fields

    Rules
  3. 03

    Summarize special requests

    Model
  4. 04

    Check against the policy

    Rules
  5. 05

    Review and approve

    Person
  6. 06

    Send for signature

    Rules

At a glance

Trigger
A new matter is approved and an engagement letter is needed.
Typical inputs
  • Matter intake with scope and fee arrangement
  • Approved engagement templates and clause library
  • Client details and conflict clearance
  • Rate cards
Systems it usually connects to
  • Clio
  • DocuSign
  • SharePoint
  • Outlook
How the work splits

4 rules, 1 model, 1 person steps

How it runs, step by step

6 steps, each tagged by what does the work. Rules are fixed logic, a model reads or drafts, and a person decides.

  • Rules Fixed logic in code
  • Model AI reads or drafts, with a confidence score
  • Person A named person decides
  1. 1

    Select the template

    Rules

    Matter type, jurisdiction and fee structure choose the template and the optional clauses.

  2. 2

    Fill the fields

    Rules

    Parties, scope, fees, rates, billing terms and dates are inserted from the matter record.

  3. 3

    Summarize special requests

    Model

    A model reads the intake notes and lists requests that need non-standard wording, such as a cap or a particular reporting duty.

  4. 4

    Check against the policy

    Rules

    Rules verify that conflict clearance and KYC are complete and that fee terms follow firm policy.

  5. 5

    Review and approve

    Person

    The responsible partner edits and approves the letter, including any non-standard terms.

  6. 6

    Send for signature

    Rules

    The approved letter is sent for e-signature, and the signed copy is filed to the matter.

Where people approve

The decisions that stay with your team, whatever the confidence score says.

  • The responsible partner approves every letter.
  • Non-standard clauses need risk approval.
  • Letters are not sent until conflict and KYC checks are cleared.

KPIs to track

What to measure, before and after. Targets come from your own baseline.

  1. 01Days from matter approval to a signed engagement
  2. 02Letters sent with a non-standard clause
  3. 03Time the partner spends per letter
  4. 04Matters that start work without a signed letter

Questions about this workflow

Does the model write new legal clauses?

It should not. Clauses come from your approved library. The model summarizes requests for non-standard terms, and your lawyers write any new wording.

Can it handle different jurisdictions?

Yes, as separate templates and rules per jurisdiction. Your lawyers own that content, and we implement the selection logic.

Which steps use rules, a model and a person?

Rules: select the template; fill the fields; check against the policy; send for signature. Model: summarize special requests. Person: review and approve. Rules are fixed logic in code. A model reads or drafts and reports its confidence. A named person decides.

What do we need to start?

Typically: matter intake with scope and fee arrangement; approved engagement templates and clause library; client details and conflict clearance; rate cards. You also need read access to Clio, DocuSign, SharePoint and Outlook, or the equivalents you use. A workflow audit measures your volumes and past cases first, then gives a fixed price for the build, so you can decide with real numbers.

Where this fits at Scenox

More use cases like this one

All 60 use cases

Plan how to draft engagement letters from approved templates with an engineer.

A 30-minute call with an engineer. You will leave knowing what a system could do for that workflow and what it would take to build.

What happens next

  1. 1

    Strategy call

    We learn how the workflow runs today and what a good outcome would be.

  2. 2

    Workflow audit

    We map the process and measure where a system would save the most time.

  3. 3

    Proposal

    A written scope, timeline and fixed price for your first system. No obligation to build.